Category talk:Adventist Youth Honors Answer Book/Completed Honors

From Pathfinder Wiki
Revision as of 02:29, 10 July 2015 by W126jep (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Was trying to get the Flower Arrangement honor to show up on the completed honors page (Yay for cross-linking!). However, I'm not sure I did it correctly - I noticed that instead of being listed under F for Flower Arrangement, it's listing under A.... so I'm a tad confused. Any advice? Bluescifiworm 11:40, 1 September 2013 (EDT)

It was there, you just couldn't find it because it was showing up under 'A' for Adventist Youth Honors Answer Book. I added a sort key to the category markup to make it appear in the 'F' section. You can diff it to see what I did. --Jomegat 12:34, 1 September 2013 (EDT)
Ah, thank you! I'm still learning Wiki Markup. Bluescifiworm 12:29, 2 September 2013 (EDT

Does this page update itself or do we need some code in the honor page? JadeDragon (talk) 04:02, 18 November 2014 (EST)

No, it does not update automatically. We should probably get rid of it, as Category:Adventist Youth Honors Answer Book/Stage 100 does what it was intended to do automatically now (well... as long as the honor sets the stage argument in its honor_desc). --Jomegat (talk) 08:30, 18 November 2014 (EST)
Should we get rid of this page, then? I am all for it because it does seem pretty redundant with the Stage100 page. --w126jep (talk) 15:31, 6 July 2015 (EDT)
Yes. But even if the category page is deleted, the category will exist until no pages belong to it. Just so you know! --Jomegat (talk) 22:36, 6 July 2015 (EDT)
Which would mean going to each page and deleting the category from that page. Which sounds like a large project. Maybe I'll put it on my list of things to do. --w126jep (talk) 01:30, 9 July 2015 (EDT)
Yeah, sorry. The 'bot could do it, but it would fail on any /es pages. I could dust it off for non /es pages though. --Jomegat (talk) 04:44, 9 July 2015 (EDT)
Well, that sure would be better than trying to go through all of them. I wouldn't mind going through the /es pages after the bot cleaned it up. --w126jep (talk) 21:29, 9 July 2015 (EDT)